Stop hiring a Head of CX like it's still a department

For about a decade, hiring a senior customer experience leader was a fairly straightforward exercise. You wrote a job spec for someone to run the CX function, they built a team, the team owned the customer journey, and everyone else in the business mostly stayed out of their way. That model is breaking down, and it's breaking down faster than most job specs have caught up with.

The pattern showing up across customer experience research and practitioner commentary going into 2026 is consistent: CX is being pulled out of any single team's ownership and spread across marketing, sales, product, support and IT, all of whom now touch the customer journey in ways that didn't used to overlap. The organisations doing this well are moving toward shared ownership models, often with a "journey owner" sitting across functions rather than a department head sitting on top of one.

Why the old model stops working

A customer journey was never really confined to one department, that was always a convenient fiction. What's changed is that the fiction has stopped being useful. When a customer's experience is shaped by a marketing automation platform, a sales process, a support AI agent and a product team's roadmap all in the same week, a CX leader who can only speak the language of their own department is structurally unable to do the job, no matter how good they are at the parts they can control.

The strongest CX candidates we see right now rarely have "customer experience" in their job title. What they have is credibility with marketing, sales and product leads simultaneously, and that turns out to matter more.

CX leader Marketing Support Sales Product
CX leadership now runs through influence across functions, not authority over one department.

What this means for the brief you write

If your CX leadership brief reads like a list of departmental responsibilities, own the support function, manage the CX budget, report on satisfaction scores, it's describing the job as it existed five years ago. The brief that actually matches where the function is heading reads more like an influence map: who does this person need to be credible with, where do they need a seat at the table without owning the budget, and how comfortable are they running initiatives through other people's teams rather than their own.

That last point is the one most hiring panels underweight. A strong candidate from a traditional, departmental CX background can sometimes struggle in this version of the role, not because they lack skill, but because they've spent their career building authority through headcount and budget, and the new version of the job asks them to build it through relationships and credibility instead. That's a genuinely different skill, and it's worth testing for directly rather than assuming it.

A question worth asking in every CX leadership interview now

Ask the candidate to describe a time they had to improve something that belonged, on paper, to someone else's team. How they answer tells you whether they're going to thrive in a cross-functional version of this role or quietly struggle against an organisation that no longer hands out the kind of authority they're used to having by default.

We'd rather have that conversation in the interview room than watch it play out six months into a placement, which is exactly why it's one of the first things we probe for when we're building a shortlist for a CX leadership search.

Talk to us about a search

Free download

The UK & Europe Hiring Guide for CXM and RevTech Teams

Salary benchmarks, time-to-fill realities and what the first hire in a new market actually requires.

Get the guide →